Skip to main content
Clean Best logo
Menu
Call 02 5839 30120485 000 860

Canterbury NSW 2193

A back room shared by several Canterbury tenancies and one floor

When three Canterbury tenancies store goods in the same rear room, the floor between their stacks belongs to nobody. It is the part that gets dirtiest, it is the part everyone walks across, and it is the part no cleaning contract currently covers.

Request a fixed quote Call 02 5839 3012

In short

Shared storage in a Canterbury building creates a predictable gap. Each tenant's cleaner works inside that tenant's leased area, and the common floor of the shared room falls outside all of them. The result is a space that everyone uses, everyone complains about and nobody has engaged anyone to clean.

Clean Best resolves it the same way it would any common area: one scope, one instructing party, one written boundary. That party is usually the building owner or manager rather than a tenant. The proposal names the shared floor, the access route and the waste point, and states that individual tenants' stored goods are not touched. Attendance is from Seven Hills.

Why three cleaners produce an unclean room

Each tenant's contractor has a scope tied to a leased boundary, and each one is behaving correctly by staying inside it. The shared floor is outside every boundary, so three competent contractors attend the building weekly and the common area deteriorates steadily. Nobody is at fault and the situation is entirely predictable once the arrangement is described, which is why it is worth describing rather than assuming somebody will pick it up.

The fix is structural rather than a matter of goodwill. Someone has to commission the common area as its own scope, with a stated area, a frequency and a party paying for it. That is normally the owner or the managing agent, recovering the cost through outgoings in the usual way. Once it exists, the boundary questions become simple, because there is a document that says where each responsibility starts.

Marking the boundary in a room with no walls

Shared storage rooms rarely have physical divisions. Tenants occupy an understood corner, and the understanding shifts as one business grows and another shrinks. A cleaning scope written against those informal areas will be out of date within a year, and a crew will be left deciding on the night which stack belongs to whom. By the time anyone raises it, the informal boundary has usually moved twice and nobody agrees on where it started.

The workable approach is to scope the room by function instead. The circulation route through the middle, the area in front of the door, the approach to the waste point and any shared bench are common and are cleaned. Anything within a stack, on a tenant's shelving or under their pallets is not, regardless of where the informal line currently sits. Function survives a change of occupancy in a way that a hand-drawn boundary does not.

Waste is where shared rooms actually fail

The bin in a shared store is the flashpoint. One tenant generates most of the volume, another presents packaging without flattening it, and the collection frequency was set for a different mix of businesses years ago. The room then smells, attracts activity and becomes unpleasant to use, and each tenant blames the others rather than the arrangement. Meanwhile the collection contractor is working exactly to the arrangement it was given years ago.

A cleaning scope cannot fix the underlying allocation, but it can stop making it worse. Naming who presents waste, where, in what condition, and how often the area around the bins is cleaned turns an ongoing dispute into a set of stated expectations. Where volumes have plainly outgrown the collection, that is reported to the manager as a collection question rather than absorbed as extra cleaning. That report costs nothing and it is the only way the arrangement gets revisited.

Shared store items to settle in Canterbury

  • One instructing party named for the common area scope
  • Room scoped by function rather than by informal tenant areas
  • Circulation route, door approach and waste point included
  • Tenant stacks, shelving and pallets excluded from handling
  • Waste presentation condition and responsibility stated
  • Collection frequency issues reported to the manager, not absorbed
Clean Best supervisor checking a cleaned warehouse floor in Wetherill Park NSW

Working in Canterbury and the Canterbury-Bankstown

Canterbury in the Canterbury-Bankstown region mixes retail, healthcare, education and mixed-use property, much of it in older buildings where several tenancies sit behind one street frontage and share whatever service space exists at the rear. Those shared rooms were not designed as common areas and are not usually described as such in any lease, which is precisely why they end up uncleaned. Clean Best services Canterbury from Seven Hills and prefers to deal with one instructing party for a shared space, because a scope agreed with three tenants separately tends to satisfy none of them.

Questions about Canterbury

Can tenants share the cost of cleaning a common store?

They can, but the arrangement works far better when one party commissions the work and recovers the cost, usually the owner or managing agent through outgoings. Splitting instructions between tenants produces conflicting priorities and no clear point of contact when something needs deciding. One scope, one instructing party and one invoice keeps the arrangement stable as tenancies change.

What if one tenant's stock spreads into the shared route?

It is reported to the managing party rather than moved. A cleaning crew has no standing to relocate one tenant's goods, and doing so creates exactly the dispute the scope is meant to prevent. A dated note describing where the route is obstructed gives the manager something to raise, and repeated notes make the pattern impossible to ignore.

Does the scope cover the tenants' own storage areas?

Not unless a tenant separately engages that work. The common scope covers the circulation route, the door approach, the waste area and any shared bench or sink. A tenant wanting their own stack area cleaned can arrange it as its own line, which keeps the boundary clear and avoids the common scope quietly expanding to cover private storage.

Who is responsible for the waste area condition?

Presentation of waste sits with whoever generates it, and the scope should state the expected condition, such as cartons flattened and material inside the bin rather than beside it. Cleaning covers the floor around the bins at a stated frequency. Where the volume clearly exceeds the collection arrangement, that is a matter for the manager and the waste contractor.

How often should a shared store room be cleaned?

It depends on the traffic rather than the area, and in most buildings a weekly or fortnightly attendance holds it. What matters more than the interval is that the attendance exists at all and that someone receives the reports. A room cleaned fortnightly with issues reported will stay in better condition than one cleaned weekly by three parties who never speak.

Related pages

Get a fixed written quote for Canterbury

Free walkthrough, scope in writing, price back within 24 hours.

Request a quote
Call nowEmail us